I never really noticed this before, but isn't this a bit odd?
![[IMG]]()
vol1 is made up of 6x4TB HDDs in a raidz2, has 10GB reserved space configured, and dedupe disabled.
The only thing I can think of as to why a dataset below the volume would report a "size" that's bigger than that of the volume is because it's not showing hardware size?
But more so, a variable size that takes compression into consideration?
Why's the dataset bigger than the volume?
![[IMG]](http://i.imgur.com/FOPCZhB.png)
vol1 is made up of 6x4TB HDDs in a raidz2, has 10GB reserved space configured, and dedupe disabled.
The only thing I can think of as to why a dataset below the volume would report a "size" that's bigger than that of the volume is because it's not showing hardware size?
But more so, a variable size that takes compression into consideration?
I'm not really convinced with that idea;...
Why's the dataset bigger than the volume?